Prototype 1.6 inclusion? posted by Michael Mullen @ Wed, 05 Mar 2008 17:07:05 -0000

Michael Mullen — Wed, 05 Mar 2008 17:07:05 -0000

nice work. That’s the kind of thoughtfulness that got me to buy this book.

Prototype 1.6 inclusion? posted by Christophe Porteneuve @ Mon, 12 Nov 2007 00:08:01 -0000

Christophe Porteneuve — Mon, 12 Nov 2007 00:08:01 -0000

Yes, the book is 100% up to date on Prototype 1.6, as we’ve been careful to sync our releases.

Prototype 1.6 inclusion? posted by Eric Stewart @ Wed, 07 Nov 2007 22:50:17 -0000

Eric Stewart — Wed, 07 Nov 2007 22:50:17 -0000

I was very happy to see the recent updates in the book. I’m so glad the book and it’s code examples have been updated to reflect Prototype 1.6 as they are pretty major upgrades from 1.5.

Thank you kindly.

Prototype 1.6 inclusion? posted by Eric Stewart @ Fri, 02 Nov 2007 18:49:10 -0000

Eric Stewart — Fri, 02 Nov 2007 18:49:10 -0000

Will this book be updated to address some of the transitions made in Prototype 1.6? For instance. Class inheritance is now much cleaner and more modern in 1.6 than it was in previous versions. Not only that, but class creation itself seems to be much more straight forward by passing what looks like an object literal into the Class.create() method itself.

It appears to me that 1.6 is really a pretty major version change from what I’ve seen in the beta book I purchased yesterday.

Recent Posts in 'Prototype 1.6 inclusion?' | Pragmatic Forums

Prototype 1.6 inclusion? posted by Michael Mullen @ Wed, 05 Mar 2008 17:07:05 -0000

Prototype 1.6 inclusion? posted by Christophe Porteneuve @ Mon, 12 Nov 2007 00:08:01 -0000

Prototype 1.6 inclusion? posted by Eric Stewart @ Wed, 07 Nov 2007 22:50:17 -0000

Prototype 1.6 inclusion? posted by Eric Stewart @ Fri, 02 Nov 2007 18:49:10 -0000