At first sight the rgx is just wrong
`"^(?=.{8,})(?=.*[a-z])(?=.*[A-Z])(?=.*[\d])(?=.*[\W]).*$"`

To be sure I checked in C26.0.1410.63 and it clearly treats the rgx as expected:a concatenation of uncaptured groups instead of a conjunction of them. Now I wanted to put this into the errata just to find out that my rgx skills are more limited than I hoped. The only way I see is a very ugly, long and unreadable list of alternatives of all permutations of sequences like `UC.*LC.*... | LC.*UC.* ...`

where I cannot even construct the length constraint.

Any ideas about this?

Cheers Robert